Cumulative vs. Current-Period Indices
| Index Type | Formula | Behavior | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative CPI | ΣEV ÷ ΣAC | Stable, smooths out monthly variation, converges over time | EAC prediction, program health assessment, trend direction |
| Current-Period CPI | Monthly EV ÷ Monthly AC | Volatile, sensitive to monthly events (large procurements, milestone completions) | Detecting recent changes, identifying emerging problems, validating recovery claims |
| Cumulative SPI | ΣEV ÷ ΣPV | Stable but converges to 1.0 at program end (all planned work eventually done) | Mid-program schedule assessment. Less useful near program end. |
| Current-Period SPI | Monthly EV ÷ Monthly PV | Volatile but reveals current execution rate | Monthly performance assessment, recovery tracking |
💡 SPI Converges to 1.0 — Use Schedule Variance Instead
At program completion, all planned work is done, so cumulative EV = BAC = cumulative PV, and SPI = 1.0 regardless of whether the program was 2 years late. This makes SPI less useful for schedule assessment in the program’s final third. Use time-based schedule metrics (slip in months, critical path analysis) alongside SPI for schedule health assessment.
The CPI Stability Rule
The most important empirical finding in EVMS research: cumulative CPI stabilizes after the 20% completion point and rarely improves by more than 0.10 thereafter.
| Month | % Complete | Cum CPI | Cum SPI | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 10% | 1.05 | 0.92 | Early — CPI looks good but SPI showing schedule pressure. Indices still volatile. |
| 12 | 22% | 0.94 | 0.88 | At the 20% point. CPI 0.94 = expect final CPI between 0.84–1.04. SPI declining. |
| 18 | 38% | 0.91 | 0.85 | CPI continuing to decline. Now expect final CPI 0.81–1.01. Trend is negative — not recovering. |
| 24 | 55% | 0.88 | 0.82 | Red flag. CPI 0.88 at 55% complete = EAC will be ~14% over budget. Recovery is statistically improbable. |
Action at month 24: With CPI at 0.88 and declining, the program team should: (1) develop a realistic EAC using multiple methods, (2) identify the root causes of cost overrun (are we inefficient, or was the baseline wrong?), (3) present management with options: rebaseline, descope, or accept the overrun.
Reading the Trend
| Pattern | What It Means | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Stable CPI > 0.95 | Program is executing on or near budget | Maintain. Monitor for emerging issues. |
| CPI declining month-over-month | Getting worse. New cost drivers are emerging or existing ones are growing. | Root cause analysis. Variance Analysis Report on largest CA contributors. |
| CPI stable at 0.85–0.95 | Program has a structural efficiency problem. Will not self-correct. | Management intervention required. Realistic EAC. Corrective action plan with measurable milestones. |
| CPI < 0.85 | Severe overrun. Recovery extremely unlikely without scope or baseline change. | Formal rebaseline assessment. Scope trade study. Customer notification. |
| Current CPI improving but cumulative flat | Recent performance is better but not enough to move the cumulative needle. | Validate improvement is real (not timing). Check if recovery rate is sufficient to change EAC trajectory. |
| SPI < 1.0 with CPI > 1.0 | Behind schedule but under budget. May be “buying schedule” with less work than planned. | Examine whether under-budget means underperformance. Check if work is being deferred. |
Reporting Thresholds
| Level | Threshold | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Green | CPI/SPI ≥ 0.95 | Normal reporting. Monitor trends. |
| Yellow | CPI/SPI 0.90–0.95 | Variance analysis required. Identify root causes. Corrective action plan within 30 days. |
| Red | CPI/SPI < 0.90 | Formal CAR/VAR. Management review. Customer notification. Recovery plan or rebaseline assessment. |
⚠️ Don’t Manage Indices — Manage the Work
A common dysfunction: program teams focus on “improving CPI” by manipulating earned value claims (claiming more % complete than warranted) or deferring cost recognition. This makes the indices look better temporarily but does not change the reality. Manage the work: reduce rework, improve productivity, control scope. The indices will follow.
🎯 The Bottom Line
CPI and SPI are the vital signs of your program. Cumulative CPI stabilizes early and predicts the future: if it is 0.88 at the 20% point, plan for a final CPI of 0.78–0.98. Current-period indices reveal whether you are getting better or worse. Use both together: cumulative for prediction, current-period for trend detection. And remember — the indices are symptoms, not causes. When they signal a problem, the response is root cause analysis and corrective action on the work, not manipulation of the numbers. Next: Variance Analysis & Reporting — turning index signals into actionable root cause narratives.
Stop reading, start modeling
Model your process flow, run simulations, optimize staffing with TOC math, and test your knowledge with 107 interactive checks — all in one platform.